Skip over navigation
*
* Image of the Portswatch logo * Images of cranes and a ship
Image of water
* * * *

Introduction   

*

News   

*

Media   

*

Latest press release

*

Issues   

*

Environment, Government
policy
, Heritage, Local communities, Trade, Transport

*

Actions   

*

Current port proposals   

*

Bathside Bay
Dibden Bay
Felixstowe
London Gateway

*

More information   

*

Contacts   

Image of a fishDibden Bay saved!

Plans to build a new superport have been rejected by the Government. The proposed new container terminal at Dibden Bay in the New Forest would have destroyed wildlife areas of national and international importance and prevented the area’s inclusion in the new New Forest National Park.

Read the press release for more information on the decision.

Click here for a brief summary and Portswatch's response to the decision.

Dibden Bay

Proposed seaport development at Dibden Bay
Dibden Bay (yellow line
encloses development area)

Dibden Bay is situated on the South coast and lies within the Southampton Water Special Protection Area (SPA) and the proposed New Forest National Park. It is:

  • a Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI)
  • close to a candidate Special Area of Conservation (cSAC).

Proposed Development

A private company - Associated British Ports (ABP) - wanted to build a vast new port on the New Forest side of Southampton Water. The site and area around it is 'protected' by various international, national and local environmental designations.

Objections to the proposal

The proposal was opposed by local people as well as the local MP, New Forest District Council, Hampshire County Council and many other organisations because:

  • ABP had not fully proven the need for the port
  • ABP had not fully assessed the alternatives
  • the economic 'benefits' did not outweigh the huge environmental costs
  • the Environmental Impact Assessment was inadequate

Wildlife in the area

The area provides important habitats for various wading and sea-birds including:

  • more than 50,000 waterfowl overwinter in the SPA
  • internationally important breeding populations of five bird species in summer

The proposed developments would have meant the loss of substantial areas of grassland and inter-tidal habitat.

Quality of life

The local communities would have been greatly affected by:

  • traffic generated: 5,000 new vehicle movements and 50 new freight train movements per day
  • air, noise, water and light pollution
  • clear views from Southampton impeded and tranquility lost

For more information:

Felixstowe >

Image © ABP

*
*
Image of water
*
* Royal Society for the Protection of Birds logo Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society logo The Wildlife Trusts logo Marine Conservation Society logo Friends of the Earth logo Transport 2000 logo Campaign to Protect Rural England logo The Wildfowl and Wetlands Trust logo

© 2004, Portswatch, info@portswatch.org.uk