- Home >
- News & Events >
- News >
- Natural Resources news >
- Archive >
- 2003 >
- Why the Safeway take-over must be stopped
- 2003
- 10 reasons supermarket mergers are bad for consumers, farmers and small businesses
- Asda spinach over pesticide levels
- Asda/Wal-Mart exploits planning loophole
- Biting back at GM crops
- Blair sacks Meacher
- Committee Stage for Recycling Bill
- Cornwall goes GM-free
- Credibility of GM public debate hangs by a thread
- Cumbria goes GM-free
- Deplorable attack on GM scientific critic
- Devon votes to go GM-free
- Dorset demands caution over GM crops
- EU commission calls for GM contamination of organic food to be allowed
- EU meets US over GM trade war
- Farmers and consumers must have a say in Wal-Mart takeover
- Fat cats fight over Safeway, consumers and farmers are real losers
- Fat-cat Tesco: putting on the pounds at farmers' expense
- Garden pesticides health warning
- GM activists make a pilgrimage for a GM-free Britain
- GM activists make a pilgrimage for a GM-free Britain
- GM beet research answers very few questions
- GM contamination - Government experts disagree
- GM jury challenges FSA policy on labelling
- GM public debate fiasco
- GM study highlights need for urgent rethink over GM crops
- GM trade war - who decides what we eat?
- GM trade war accelerates
- GM won't cure hunger in Africa
- GM-free food could be "impossible"
- Government agrees to delay GM debate
- Government failing to regulate supermarkets, says new report
- Government launches GM debate
- Government may ignore public opinion on GM crops
- Government must address GM debate chaos say groups
- Government must clarify role of GM debate
- Government opposes tough Euro GM rules
- Government report on economics of GM crops
- Government to publish GM science review
- Government urges MEPs to vote for GM food
- Government warns GM farmers over contamination threat
- Hundreds of pesticides banned
- Hundreds turn out for Waste lobby
- Illegal GM contamination threat
- Is Tesco spin on Safeway takeover a joke?
- Lake District National Park first to go GM-free
- Lake District National Park to host GM debate
- Local campaigners call for GM-free Britain election pledge
- MEPs back tougher GM labels
- Ministers try to stop GM food labels
- Morrisons take-over bad news for consumers
- MPs call for extension to GM national debate
- New analysis casts doubt on GM farm scale evaluations
- New maps reveal massive extent of GM pollution threat
- Pesticide review fails consumers and farmers
- Recycling Bill clears the Commons
- Safeway decision must wait for code review
- Sainsbury's: making life taste bitter for banana growers
- Scepticism as GM debate ends
- Second reading for Recycling Bill
- Shameful EU plans for growing GM crops
- Shropshire goes gm-free
- Slow progress on pesticide residues
- Slow progress on pesticide residues
- South Gloucestershire votes to go GM-free
- South Hams votes to go GM-free
- Stop Safeway stitch-up, alliance demands
- Supermarket code fails farmers
- Supermarket code fails farmers
- Supermarkets continue to shun GM food
- Supermarkets must be blocked from Safeway takeover
- The US ghost fleet – behind the hype
- UK votes to keep highly toxic pesticide
- UN treaty regulating GM to become law
- Uncertainty over GM safety
- US files WTO GM complaint
- US threat over GM food
- Warwickshire goes GM-free
- Why the Safeway take-over must be stopped
Why the Safeway take-over must be stopped30 April 2003
Friends of the Earth presented its case for preventing the take-over of Safeway at an open meeting held by the Competition Commission on 30 April. The environmental campaign group explained why each of the proposed bids by rival supermarkets would be bad for consumers, farmers and small businesses. The meeting was divided into two sections. One looked at national impacts, including effects on suppliers, and the other at local impacts including effects on consumers. Friends of the Earth's presentation included the following points:
National/supplier impacts
- Allowing any of the supermarket bidders to take over Safeway would put three quarters of grocery shopping in the hands of just four companies. This is an unacceptable degree of concentration.
- The Supermarket Code of Practice is the only action taken by Government to redress the imbalance of power between major supermarkets and their suppliers including farmers. Evidence, including from a Friends of the Earth survey, suggests that the Code has failed and that supermarkets are continuing to abuse their power. Further concentration of power will exacerbate existing problems.
- Farmers in the UK are already going out of business as a result of the unreasonable demands of the major supermarkets, giving them more power will make things worse. We could be left with fewer large intensive farmers in the UK and more global sourcing, going against consumer's stated desire for more local and UK produced food.
Local/consumer impacts
- The Competition Commission must consider the impact on smaller and independent local shops, which find it hard to compete with the major supermarkets. Real consumer choice can only be provided by a diversity of shops, not by a range of big supermarkets.
- The Office of Fair Trading has warned that prices may go up if competition is reduced. The Competition Commission's report on supermarkets in 2000 found that the major supermarkets put prices up in locations where they did not have a major rival.
- The loss of local shops can have a higher impact on lower income families who may not have access to a car. The Competition Commission must consider the impacts of more local shops closing down if market share gets even more concentrated. And if the Competition Commission is considering allowing Safeway to be taken over if the bidding supermarket sells off some stores it must assess the impacts of shoppers having to travel further for grocery shopping.
Friends of the Earth also reminded the Competition Commission of the conclusions of its 2000 report on supermarkets. This found that the power of the biggest supermarkets allowed them to engage in practices which were anti-competitive and against the public interest. Since that report no effective action has been taken to address these issues so it is hard to see how the Government could now allow further concentration of power. Friends of the Earth has sent in a detailed submission to the Competition Commission setting out its views.
"Allowing Safeway to be taken over by a rival supermarket chain would be very bad for consumers, farmers and small shop owners," said Friends of the Earth's Real Food Campaigner, Pete Riley. "It will mean that powerful and rich corporations will cream off yet more trade and profits from smaller companies. The Competition Commission has already highlighted supermarket practices that work against the public interest. It must stop this take-over to prevent supermarkets having even more power over all our lives."
Get these updates first
If you would like these news updates to be emailed to you as soon as they come out, then join our real food mailing list.
Register Here




Discuss "Why the Safeway take-over must be stopped" in our forum