Credibility of GM public debate hangs by a thread20 March 2003
The credibility of the independent public debate on the commercialisation of genetically modified (GM) food and crops is in the balance following an open meeting of the Debate Steering Board. Members expressed concern at the meeting that a DEFRA private briefing of media correspondents earlier in the week (18 March) had resulted in articles stating that: "Government officials have confirmed that this summer's debate on GM crops will not influence whether they are grown in the UK." (Farmers'Weekly Interactive 19 March 2003)
Chairman of the debate steering board Professor Malcolm Grant said he had written to DEFRA Secretary of State Margaret Beckett to seek "reassurance that we are not wasting our time".
Other members expressed concern that if decisions on commercialising GM crops were made in the run-up or during the debate, the credibility and value of the debate in the eyes of the public would be seriously damaged. The principle aim of the GM debate clearly included consideration of whether GM food and crops should be grown commercially in the UK.
There are currently 19 applications submitted through the EU (two to the UK) for commercial marketing consents for GM seeds. The UK is required to give an opinion on all of them in a rigid time-scale set down by EC Directive. This means that the UK has to say yes or no to each application during the debate. However, the Government can ask for more information on the applications which would delay the decision making process.
"The public credibility of the GM public debate is hanging by a thread. The Secretary of State must make an unequivocal statement that the Government will listen to the views of the public, as gathered through the GM Public Debate, before making a decision on the commercialisation of GM. Otherwise the Debate Steering Committee are right to think they are wasting their time. Ministers must also provide an assurance that they will not give an opinion on any application until after the debate. Failure to provide such assurances will seriously undermine the whole debate in the eyes of the public," said Friends of the Earth's Real Food Campaigner, Pete Riley.
Get these updates first
If you would like these news updates to be emailed to you as soon as they come out, then join our real food mailing list.
Register Here
More news >
