19 Jan 2000
UK insurance companies are failing to take environmental and social
issues seriously. Capital
Punishment - The Insurance Industry and the Global Environment,
a report [Acrobat PDF approx. 184KB]
published today by Friends of the Earth (FOE), concludes that the great
majority of investment funds are fuelling environmentally and socially
damaging behaviour by multi-national companies. This is in spite of
the growth in demand for 'ethical' investment funds with 'green' investment
policies.
Capital Punishment
looks at the social and environmental record of 14 large companies including
Exxon, ICI, Monsanto and Rio Tinto. Mining, oil, chemical and forest
product companies continue to clear irreplaceable forests and habitats,
pollute waterways, emit greenhouse gases and tolerate working alongside
oppressive regimes. The report provides details of the holdings that
UK insurance companies had in these companies (as of Summer 1999) [1].
The report provides a league table of insurance companies and their
environmental policies[2]. In response to a survey conducted for the
report (and a series of meetings between FOE and top UK insurance companies)
not one company was able to demonstrate that it did all of the following
- the average positive response was one out of five questions asked.Companies
were asked if they
FOE believes that the insurance industry, with its enormous financial weight [4], should push companies to improve their environmental record, as well as pressing Government to introduce mandatory corporate environmental reporting and tough regulatory regimes to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, encourage clean production and protect biodiversity.
Commenting, FOE Policy and Campaigns Director Tony Juniper said:
The vast majority of investment decisions are made with only
one thing in mind - a search for fast returns. Of course, any investment
fund has to protect the interests of its investors, and look to make
their capital grow. But as global events such as extreme weather conditions
linked to climate change now cost the insurance industry billions of
dollars every year, as well as killing many thousands of people across
the planet, the search for a quick buck - as opposed to long-term sustainable
rewards - no longer makes social or even financial sense.
Today we reveal the failure of Britain's insurance companies to
make ethical, social or environmental decisions when investing. We hope
that more and more these companies' millions of customers will demand
better investment policies and insist that their money is not used to
fund destructive transnational companies. The likes of Exxon, Monsanto,
and ICI must be told that their shares will be sold if they do not comply
with tough environmental standards.
NOTES
[1] Norwich Union, for example, holds shares
in some of the most environmentally irresponsible oil companies such
as Chevron, Elf Aquitaine, Exxon, Mobil and Occidental; in mining companies
such as Rio Tinto and in chemical companies such as Glaxo Wellcome,
Great Lakes Chemical and ICI. Yet in its 1998 Annual Report, the Norwich
Union Group states: We...take environmental issues into account
when making commercial decisions.
[2] see table of insurance
companies attached. The table is based on replies to a questionnaire
sent out by Friends of the Earth in the summer of 1999 to each of the
companies below. The questionnaire asked for details of their ethical
policies relating to their investments as indicated below.
[3] Since FOE has carried out this research,
the Prudential Portfolio Management announced in December 1999 that
they will be implementing mainstream screening of their UK equity investments.
Friends of the Earth hope to see this kind of comprehensive approach
to mainstream investments adopted by the insurance sector as a whole.
[4] The insurance industry accounts for annual
revenues of over $2 trillion worldwide and the UK is one of the most
insured countries in the world. UK pension funds alone are worth over
£760 billion and institutional investors hold the majority of shares
in companies such as Shell, Rio Tinto, Monsanto and Exxon.
|
Company |
Does company have sustainable development policy? |
Does it report on policy implementation? |
Does the company carry out mainstream screening of investments on environmental and social criteria? |
Has the company signed UNEP's Insurance Industry Statement of Environmental Commitment? |
|
Allied Dunbar |
Yes |
Yes |
Not Sure |
No (1) |
|
AXA Sun Life |
No |
No |
No |
No |
|
Barclays |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
|
CGU |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
|
Clerical Medical |
Refused |
Refused |
Refused |
Refused |
|
Equitable Life |
Refused |
Refused |
Refused |
Refused |
|
Friends' Provident |
No (3) |
No |
No |
Yes |
|
Legal and General (4) |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
|
Norwich Union |
No |
Yes |
No |
Did not answer |
|
Prudential Assurance (5) |
No |
No |
No (6) |
No |
|
Royal & Sun Alliance |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
|
Scottish Equitable |
No |
No |
Yes |
Do Not Know |
|
Scottish Widows |
Refused |
Refused |
Refused |
Refused |
|
Standard Life |
No |
No |
No |
No |
NOTES TO TABLE
(1) Zurich Financial Services has signed the UNEP statement. Zurich
recently merged with BAT and owns Allied Dunbar.
(2) Eagle Star, also owned by Zurich Financial Services, does have an
ethical fund. Allied Dunbar, however, does not.
(3) Friends Provident will be bringing out its first Environmental and
Social report in 2000.
(4) Although Legal and General gave positive responses to most of the
questions, no documentation was provided.
(5) The answers were provided over the phone as Prudential refused to
complete a questionnaire. Scottish Amicable part of the Prudential Group
manage an ethical fund.
(6) Prudential Portfolio Managers (part of the Prudential Group) announced
in December 1999 that it will start to implement ethical screening of
its UK equity funds and identify social and environmental policies which
may affect company performance.
(7) No documentation was provided
Contact details:
Friends of the Earth
26-28 Underwood St.
LONDON
N1 7JQ
Tel: 020 7490 1555
Fax: 020 7490 0881
Web: www.foe.co.uk/feedback.html
Media team